نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی
نویسندگان
گروه فلسفه و کلام، دانشکده الهیات، معارف اسلامی و ارشاد، دانشگاه امام صادق (ع)، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
All theorizing about components of happiness requires determination of some criteria for prioritization to resolve practical inconsistencies. This result is affiliated to separation of dependent components (only instrument), independent components (only purpose), and semi-dependent components , providing the possibility to choose the right action like maintenance, reduction, or elimination in inconsistency situations.
Using Mullasadra’s transcendent philosophy, solving this problem doesn't seem difficult. Although he considers the theoretical faculty as the main component of happiness and has strong reasons for it, he organized his theory by the ontological concept of perfection (instead of Aristotelian virtue and function concepts) and based its explanation on unity with active intellect (not only connection). By attaching these thoughts to his other basics, especially on the domain of the study of the soul, a new image of happiness components can be formed that, in addition to development of those components, provides a way for recognition of their relation for gaining the mentioned practical result.
By conducting an analytical-descriptive examination of theories such as the profound connection between the soul and the body, the unity of the soul and its faculties, and the equivalence of existence with goodness and perfection, a new theory called "comprehensive happiness" can be inferred from Mullasadra's views using inferential-discursive methods. In this theory, all existential perfections (including bodily matters) are considered as ends by essence, constituting independent or semi-independent components of happiness. These components form a longitudinal and latitudinal network in which relationships and precedence among them are determined based on the ontological system of the world. The position of each perfection in this system provides a clear and practical criterion for determining its independence or dependence, enabling prioritization among the components of happiness and resolving potential practical inconsistencies, thus serving as an advantage of this theory over competing views.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)