نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار فلسفه اسلامی دانشگاه الزهرا (س)
2 کارشناسی ارشد از دانشگاه الزهرا
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
In the history of thought, reason and intuition are two ways considered to reach the truth. In this context, what primarily led scholars to think about is which of the two has been more reliable and functional. The two methods shows that, although each of them alone are certain advantages, but Content to one of the two arguments and witnesses, in the path of truth, does not help, and the ability to solve many of the problems of intellectual is not thinkers. The combination of these two methods is considered by some scholars. In fact these Islamic thinkers, their philosophy of intuitive tools, which can Mulla Sadra those cited. This article is a basic question: how witnesses Mulla Sadra his philosophy compatible? In this article referring to some of the criticisms raised by the use of intuition in philosophy And respond to them with regard to the wisdom Sadraee will show that some of the witnesses in the philosophy of Sadra able to use not only the dignity of rational philosophy into not compromise, but such use is perfectly synchronized with Sadraee philosophical thought.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)
