نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی
نویسنده
عضو هیئت علمی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Allah's knowledge of the universe is the same entity, and as divine essence is constant and unlimited, his knowledge is also constant and non-existent, on the other hand, we always see a constant change in a vast material world. The question is, how does the change in the partial and diverse affairs of the universe not change the trait of divine knowledge, and therefore does not change in the unity of God? The Islamic philosophers have explained the science of God in such a way that in the scientific relation of the constant and unique nature of God with the changing beings, no change in the divine nature is required. Therefore, philosophers considered the science of God to be a detailed science after nature, an exaggeration of essence. Ibn Sina referred to this syntactic science of material knowledge of variable as a partial knowledge of a variable.
Al-Ghazâlî excused them from the views of the philosophers. Ghazali's forms to philosophers were that, although God would be in all aspects of the universe, but his knowledge of them would only be general and God's knowledge would be limited to general concepts and concepts.
Mulla Sadra proved a glimpse at the same time as the detailed discovery of God and responded to al-Ghazali's forms. According to the basic rule of the divine knowledge of the divine beings, the presence of objects is in the right. God is in the degree of the nature of science to things, without plurality in its very nature, and information with all its richness and exuberance exists to the existence of a single universe and is manifested in the absence of plurality in it.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)
