Alfred North Whitehead, Mulla Sadra, Ontology of Becoming, Process Philosophy, Substantial Motion.

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran.

Abstract

This study addresses the central question of how Mulla Sadra’s Transcendent Philosophy and Alfred North Whitehead’s Process Philosophy—despite their fundamentally different intellectual and historical origins—converge in criticizing static, substance-centered metaphysics, yet diverge significantly in their accounts of the nature of “becoming” and its metaphysical implications. Employing a descriptive–analytical method within a comparative framework, the research examines these two dynamic systems along three principal axes: the nature and mechanism of flux and change in reality; the explanation of identity and continuity amid transformation; and the status and function of God and teleology in each philosophical system.

The findings indicate that the fundamental point of convergence between the two thinkers lies in replacing “being” with “becoming” and in advancing a radical critique of static metaphysics. Nevertheless, profound divergences emerge in their respective conceptions of dynamism. Mulla Sadra conceives flux as a continuous, intrinsic, and intensive process—substantial motion—occurring within a single substance that preserves personal identity. By contrast, Whitehead defines becoming as discrete, quasi-quantum, and grounded in the succession of “actual entities” interconnected through objective inheritance. While the Sadrian model exhibits strong internal coherence, it encounters challenges when confronted with discontinuous interpretations of modern physics. Conversely, Whitehead’s model, though more consonant with contemporary science, faces theoretical difficulties in accounting for the persistence of unified personal identity. This divergence culminates most sharply in theology: the transcendent and simple Sadrian God, as the unified final cause of motion, stands in contrast to Whitehead’s dipolar and affected God, who is both co-creative with the world and dynamically transformed through its processes. Ultimately, this comparative analysis not only reveals the capacity of Transcendent Philosophy to engage contemporary philosophical discourse but also, by highlighting fundamental divergences, contributes to a more precise and nuanced understanding of both metaphysical systems.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Aboudiyat, A. (2013). Darāmadi be Nezām-e Hekmat-e Sadrā'i [An Introduction to the System of Sadrian Theosophy]. SAMT Publications. [in Persian]
Akbarian, R., & Sha'bani, L. (2012). Tahlil-e Tatbiqi-ye Mafhum-e "Ruy'dād" dar Falsafeh-ye Whitehead va "Harakat-e Jowhari" dar Falsafeh-ye Mollā Sadrā [A comparative analysis of the concept of 'event' in Whitehead's philosophy and 'substantial motion' in Mulla Sadra's philosophy]. Hekmat va Falsafeh (Wisdom and Philosophy), 8 (31), 7–31. [in Persian]
Ashtiyani, S. J. (2003). Hasti az Nazar-e Falsafeh va 'Irfān [Existence from the Perspective of Philosophy and Mysticism]. Bustan-e Ketab. [in Persian]
Cobb, J. B. Jr., & Griffin, D. R. (1976). Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
Corbin, H. (2005). Takhayyol-e Khallāq dar 'Irfān-e Ibn 'Arabī [Creative Imagination in the Mysticism of Ibn 'Arabī] (I. Rahmati, Trans.). Jami Publications. [in Persian]
 
Fanaei Eshkevari, M. (2010). Moqāyeseh-ye Ma'refat-shenāsi-ye Mollā Sadrā va Kant [A comparison of the epistemology of Mulla Sadra and Kant]. Ma'rifat-i Falsafi (Philosophical Knowledge), 7 (4), 7–28. [in Persian]
Ghaeminiya, A. (2014). Metāfizik-e Inhamāni va Metāfizik-e Shodan: Moqāyese'i Miyān-e Hekmat-e Mota'āliyeh va Falsafeh-ye Puyeshi [Metaphysics of identity and metaphysics of becoming: A comparison between Transcendent Theosophy and process philosophy]. Zehn (Mind), 15 (60), 135–162. [in Persian]
Griffin, D. R. (2007). Whitehead's Radically Different Postmodern Philosophy: An Argument for Its Contemporary Relevance. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hartshorne, C. (1970). Creative Synthesis and Philosophic Method. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Javadi Amoli, A. (2011). Rahīq-e Makhtūm: Sharh-e Hekmat-e Mota'āliyeh [The Sealed Nectar: A Commentary on the Transcendent Theosophy]. Isra' Publication. [in Persian]
Johnson, A. H. (1983). Whitehead's Theory of Reality. New York: Dover Publications.
Khademi, E. (2016). Barresi-ye Tatbiqi-ye Mafhum-e Khodā dar Hekmat-e Mota'āliyeh va Falsafeh-ye Farāyandi [A comparative study of the concept of God in Transcendent Theosophy and process philosophy]. Journal of Philosophy of Religion (formerly Nameh-ye Hekmat), 14 (1), 95–118. [in Persian]
Leclerc, I. (1958). Whitehead's Metaphysics: An Introductory Exposition. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Mesbahi, M., & Ahmadi, A. (2013). Khodā dar Falsafeh-ye Whitehead va Hekmat-e Mota'āliyeh [God in Whitehead's philosophy and Transcendent Theosophy]. Hekmat va Falsafeh (Wisdom and Philosophy), 9 (34), 27–49. [in Persian]
Mesle, C. R. (2008). Process-Relational Philosophy: An Introduction to Alfred North Whitehead. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Press.
Motahhari, M. (2010). ‘Elal-e Gerāyesh be Māddigari [The Causes of Inclination towards Materialism]. Sadra Publications. [in Persian]
Motahhari, M. (2012). Majmu'ah-ye Āthār (Vol. 13: Maqālāt-e Falsafi) [Collected Works (Vol. 13: Philosophical Articles)]. Sadra Publications. [in Persian]
Mulla Sadra, M. ibn I. Q. S. (1981). Al-Ḥikmah al-Mutaʿāliyah fī al-Asfār al-ʿAqliyyah al-Arbaʿah [The Transcendent Theosophy in the Four Intellectual Journeys]. Dar Ihya' al-Turath al-'Arabi. [in Arabic]
Mulla Sadra, M. ibn I. Q. S. (2004). Kitāb al-Mashāʿir [The Book of Metaphysical Penetrations] (H. Corbin, Ed. & Trans.). Tahuri Publications. [in Arabic]
Nasr, S. H. (2013). Sadr al-Dīn Shīrāzī va Hekmat-e Mota'āliyeh [Sadr al-Dīn Shīrāzī and Transcendent Theosophy] (H. Souzanchi, Trans.). Farzan Rooz Publishing and Research. [in Persian]
Nobo, J. L. (1986). Whitehead's Metaphysics of Concrescence: A Morphogenetic Interpretation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Parsania, H. (2016). Nesbat-e Miyān-e Harakat-e Jowhari va Nazariyeh-ye Takāmol [The relationship between substantial motion and the theory of evolution]. Zehn (Mind), 17 (67), 5–26. [in Persian]
Pourhassan, Q., Ghorbani, Z., & Zamani, M. (2012). Mafhum-e Khodā dar Falsafeh-ye Whitehead [The concept of God in Whitehead's philosophy]. Philosophical-Theological Research, 13 (4), 49–72. [in Persian]
Rizvi, S. H. (2009). Mulla Sadra and Metaphysics: Modulation of Being. London: Routledge.
Sanei Dareh-bidi, M. (2006). Falsafeh-ye 'Elm-e Whitehead [Whitehead's Philosophy of Science]. Soroush Press. [in Persian]
Sha'bani, L., & Ahmadi, M. (2016). Barresi-ye Tatbiqi-ye Mafhum-e "Zamān" dar Andisheh-ye Mollā Sadrā va Whitehead [A comparative study of the concept of 'time' in the thought of Mulla Sadra and Whitehead]. Philosophical Researches of the University of Tabriz, 10 (17), 147–168. [in Persian]
Sherburne, D. W. (1966). A Key to Whitehead's Process and Reality. New York: Macmillan.
Shirvani, A. (2005). Darāmadi bar Falsafeh-ye Puyeshi-ye Whitehead [An introduction to Whitehead's process philosophy]. Nameh-ye Hekmat (Letter of Wisdom), 3 (1), 117–144. [in Persian]
Tabataba'i, S. M. H. (1997). Nihāyat al-Ḥikmah [The Culmination of Wisdom]. The Islamic Publishing Institute. [in Arabic]
Tabataba'i, S. M. H. (2011). Usūl-e Falsafeh va Ravesh-e Realism [The Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism] (with commentary by M. Motahhari). Sadra Publications. [in Persian]
Whitehead, A. N. (1933). Adventures of Ideas. New York: Macmillan.
Whitehead, A. N. (1967). Science and the Modern World. New York: The Free Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology (Corrected Edition, edited by D. R. Griffin & D. W. Sherburne). New York: The Free Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (2015). 'Elm va Jahān-e No [Science and the Modern World] (H. R. Abak, Trans.). Kargadan Press. [in Persian]

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 04 November 2025
  • Revise Date: 31 December 2025
  • Accept Date: 09 May 2026

Share

How to cite

Statistics