Similarities and Differences between Emergentism and Mulla Sadra’s Psychology

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Researcher in Iranian Institute of Philosophy (IRIP), Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

This paper - in order to make a comparative study between Sadra’s theory and a new western theory about soul’s occurrence - first focuses on studying and explaining a new theory in philosophy of mind; called “Emergentism” by contemporary philosophers. The author distinguishes between two version of Emergentism: strong and weak, and describes two challenges against the strong version which have adduced by physicalists. He, then, makes a brief review of Sadra’s theory about soul’s occurrence and its ranks, and thus considers the similarities and differences between Sadra’s view and strong emergentism. This paper, by referring to the common aspects of these two theories, believes that most challenges which have made against strong emergentism are reformable versus Sadra’s theory. He, finally, implicates some explications of Sadraian philosophers about mind – body connection, and shows their inefficiency to meet the objections and ambiguities of physicalist philosophers. He believes that Sadra’s philosophy of mind needs further completion to satisfy this requirement. The main contribution of this paper is explaining the intersections and dissociations of these two theory, and some deficiencies and ambiguities of Sadra’s view before physicalism.



Keywords

Main Subjects

References

ملاصدرا، صدرالدین محمد (۱۳۶۱). العرشیة. تهران: مولی.
ــــــ. (۱۹۸۱م). الحکمة المتعالیة فى الأسفار العقلیة الأربعة. بیروت: دار احیاء التراث العربی.
ــــــ. (بی‌تا). الحاشیة علی الهیات شفا. قم: بیدار.
Bedau, M. Humphreys, P. (2008). Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. The MIT Press.
Chalmers, David (2006). “Strong and Weak Emergence”. in Philip Clayton and Paul Davies (eds.). The Rreemergence of Emergenc, The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion. Oxford University Press.
Clyton, Philip (2004). Mind and Emergence; From Quantum to Consciousness. Oxford University Press.
Connor, Timothy; Churchill, John Ross (2010). “Is Non-Reductive Physicalism Viable Within a Causal Powers Metaphysic?”. in Cynthia Mcdonald and Graham Mcdonald (eds.). Emergence in Mind. Oxford University Press.
Davidson, Donald. (1980). Essays on Actions and Events. Clarendon Press.
Kim, Jeagwon (1998). Mind in a Physical World. Cambridge. The MIT Press.
_____. (2006). “Being Realistic About Emergentism”. in Philip Clayton and Paul Davies (eds.). The Reemergence of Emergenc, The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion. Oxford University Press.
McDonald, Cynthia and McDonald, Graham (2010). Emergence in Mind. Oxford University Press.
McLaughlin, Brian (2008). “The Rise and Fall of British Emergentism”. in M. Bedau and P. Humphreys (eds.). Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. The MIT Press.
Searl, John. (2008). “Reductionism and the Irreducibility of Consciousness”. in M. Bedau and P. Humphreys (eds.). Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. The MIT Press.
Silberstein, Michael (2006). “In Defence of Ontological Emergence and Mental Causation”. In Philip Clayton and Paul Davies (eds.). The Reemergence of Emergenc, the Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion. Oxford University Press.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 08 April 2017
  • Revise Date: 05 August 2018
  • Accept Date: 22 September 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics