The Distinguish and the Combination in "Research" and "Transcendence Process" In Prove Objectivity of Transcendent-Analysis and Composition of Norman L. Geisler and Allameh Tabatabai Thought

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 PhD Holder of Philosophy of Religion, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Philosophy, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of Comparative Philosophy, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Assistant Professor of Philosophy of Religion, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

One of the important issues that has made thinkers in the field of philosophy of religion think and reflect, is the discussion of reality and, in a more scientific sense, the objectivity of the "transcendent". being real; In other words, the transcendent has an truth independent of the mind, which this issue is presented in religious experience as essentialism, against which the idea of constructivism is raised. Norman Geisler and Allameh Tabatabai are two thinkers who have taken an essentialist approach to this issue and have tried to prove the objectivity of the transcendent with their arguments. Comparative comparison of the ideas of these two thinkers -that is novel subject- is the subject of this article, the differences and similarities of which have been explained. Allameh used the word "transcendent being" and Geisler used the word "transcendent object". According to Geisler, (the sum of philosophical reason and religious experience) and in the thought of Allama, moderate rationalism is observed. Geisler's method is empirical and philosophical, and Allameh's method is broad and includes philosophical, cosmological, intuitive-mystical, and revelatory methods. The result of such an adaptation is that the principles, methods, and concepts are distinct in the two ideas, but as a result, a similar expression is presented. Therefore, we reached the final hypothesis, which is the result of a combination of two ideas, and based on the distinction between "investigability" and "excellence process", Allameh's approach to investigability and Norman's approach to the excellence process are preferred.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

ابراهیمی دینانی، غلامحسین (۱۳۶۵ـ۱۳۶۶). قواعد کلی در فلسفه اسلامی. تهران: انتشارات پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگى‌.
باقی، عبدالرضا (پاییز و زمستان 1393). «خداشناسی عرفانی و قرآنی علامه طباطبایی». پژوهشنامه عرفان، شماره 11.
طباطبایی، سید محمدحسین (1417). نهایه الحکمه. قم: چاپ عباس علی زارعی سبزواری.
ـــــــــــــ (1428). نهایه الحکمه. تحقیق عباسعلی زارعی سبزواری. چ 4. قم: مؤسسه النشر الاسلامی.
ـــــــــــــ (1367). نهایه الحکمه. ج2. تعلیق محمد تقی مصباح یزدی. تهران: انتشارات الزهرا.
ـــــــــــــ (1388). وحی یا شعور مرموز، مجموعه رسائل. ج1. قم: انتشارات دفتر تبلیغات اسلامی حوزه علمیه قم.
ـــــــــــــ (بی­تا). المیزان فی تفسیرالقرآن. ج 10. قم: جماعه المدرسین فی الحوزه العلمیه.
ـــــــــــــ (1417). تفسیرالمیزان. ج 18. قم: انتشارات جامعه مدرسین.
ـــــــــــــ (1387). بدایه الحکمه. تعلیق و تحقیق علی شیروانی. قم: دارالفکر.
ـــــــــــــ (1419هـ. ق.).  الرسائل التوحیدیه. بیروت: مؤسسه النعمان.
ـــــــــــــ (1382). شیعه: مذاکرات و مکاتبات پروفسور هانری کربن با علامه سیدمحمدحسین طباطبایی. تهران: مؤسسه پژوهشی حکمت و فلسفه ایران.
گیسلر، نورمن ال. (1391). فلسفه دین. ترجمه حمیدرضا آیت­اللهی. تهران: حکمت.
مطهری، مرتضی (1370). اصول فلسفه و روش رئالیسم. تهران: صدرا.
ملایوسفی، مجید (1383). «مسئله عینیت، پیشینه تاریخی و وجوه فلسفی». نامه حکمت، شماره 4.
Geisler, Norman.l. (1973). The missing premise in the ontological Argument, in Religious studies.
ـــــــــــــ  (2015). A philosophical Argument From Being. Bastion book.
ـــــــــــــ  (2013). knowing the truth  about  creation. Bastion book.
Leiter, B. (1998). Objectivity without space. EJAP.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 08 March 2021
  • Revise Date: 20 October 2021
  • Accept Date: 20 October 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics