falsafe molasadra
somayeh vasei; abbas javarashkian; Sayyed mortaza Hosseini shahrudi
Abstract
Knowing the truth of the material body in transcendent wisdom requires knowing the soul and consequently leading to the knowledge of the soul; But despite its importance, it has been dealt with sporadically and briefly in the works of philosophers. The present article seeks to examine in detail the truth ...
Read More
Knowing the truth of the material body in transcendent wisdom requires knowing the soul and consequently leading to the knowledge of the soul; But despite its importance, it has been dealt with sporadically and briefly in the works of philosophers. The present article seeks to examine in detail the truth of the material body according to the specific principles of Sadr al-Muta'allehin. According to the three ontological principles in transcendent wisdom, namely the originality of existence, skepticism, intensive movement, and another principle in Sadra's psychology, namely, "the soul in the unity of all forces," the existence of a human unit begins its journey from elemental matter with essential motion. It gradually reaches abstraction through the degrees of existence. This study, while examining in detail the course of matter from the abstract, explains the meaning of the material-singleness of the soul and removes two important doubts in this field, and in the end reaches the conclusion that the material dignity of the soul is combined with its abstract status. Is and the truth of the body, which is the emergence and manifestation of the powers and perfections of the soul in the form of quantitative forms; It is materially different from the soul.
falsafe molasadra
Kokab Darabi; Seyyed Morteza Hoseini Shahrudi; عباس جوارشکیان
Abstract
Philosophers have offered various interpretations of creation. In the present article, Sadra's interpretation of creation has been considered. It is well-known that creation took place in two arcs of descent and ascent, in which the descent begins from God, and after the order of attributes and names, ...
Read More
Philosophers have offered various interpretations of creation. In the present article, Sadra's interpretation of creation has been considered. It is well-known that creation took place in two arcs of descent and ascent, in which the descent begins from God, and after the order of attributes and names, the worlds of intellect and example have reached the world of nature, and the beginning of the ascent, the world of nature and the end of God. And other worlds are between the two. Since in conventional theory, creation is associated with revelation, serious questions arise. Is the natural world the lowest of the worlds, and are beings in this world ultimately flawed? Is the end of the ascent arc exactly the beginning of the descent arc? Is it a reasonable hypothesis that a complete being would be reduced to weakness and degraded again from the lowest point to the first? In this article, while reviewing and criticizing the common view, an attempt is made to provide a new model of the creation process while answering the questions raised. In Mukhtar's theory, creation is constantly moving towards perfection and goes from the level of necessity of existence and the existence of science that is with God Almighty to the real worlds, that is, the world of intellect, example and nature. This process of creation is constantly intensifying and completing. What is revealed from the level of God's essence after the revelation is still present in the former order, only the way they appear in the revealed order is different.
falsafe molasadra
Samane Sheikhnezami; Mohammad Saeid AbdeKhodaei; Zohre Sepehri Shamloo; Abbas Javareshkian
Abstract
The aim of this study is to extract concepts from the heart of transcendent philosophy to form a psychological theory. The basic premise is that Sadr al-Muta'allehin's views include the implications needed to formulate a theory of psychology. The second and third assumptions are that various aspects ...
Read More
The aim of this study is to extract concepts from the heart of transcendent philosophy to form a psychological theory. The basic premise is that Sadr al-Muta'allehin's views include the implications needed to formulate a theory of psychology. The second and third assumptions are that various aspects of a psychological theory can be deduced from the transcendent philosophy of Mulla Sadra. Moreover, Mulla Sadra's opinions have explanatory and helpful concepts in comparison with the existing theories in psychology.The results of the research confirm thiese assumptions and show that Mulla Sadra's views carry significant notions in the science of psychology, and by examining Sadra's anthropology, the basic assumptions in a psychological approach can be extracted.In this paper, presuppositions in the field of ontology are extracted and compared with the field of "human position in the world" with the approach of existentialism and in the field of "human definition" with the approach of behaviorism. Furthermore, some assumptions concerning "human evolution and development" have been extracted and compared in the fields of "human instincts" using a psychoanalytic approach, and "evolutionary features" based on Piaget's theory of "constructivism".Regarding the stages of infinite evolution in Sadra's views, we have not found any equivalent in psychology for comparison.
falsafe molasadra
Feizollah Abedini; Abbas Javareshkian; Seyed Morteza Hosseini Shahrudi
Abstract
Since one of the explicit differences between Avicenna and Mulla Sadra’s philosophical thought based on the important issue of ‘Motion’ specially ‘Substantial Motion’, and there’s complete difference in the debate, the author has tried to response the questions about ...
Read More
Since one of the explicit differences between Avicenna and Mulla Sadra’s philosophical thought based on the important issue of ‘Motion’ specially ‘Substantial Motion’, and there’s complete difference in the debate, the author has tried to response the questions about the origins and theoretical basis of this difference and to find out which position and principle have been involved in this contrast. First part of the essay studies the difference between Avicenna and Mulla Sadra‘s essential position through analytical comparison of ‘Motion Premise’ in the thought of these two well-known philosophers. 1- Sadra’s perception of motion against Avicenna’s quiddity and category centered attitude. 2- Expanding of ‘Motion’ discussion from concretes to abstracts especially human soul. 3- Change in the position of’ Motion’ from the section of natural issues to the section of common affairs. By analytical studying of the mentioned points specially with meditating in Avicenna’s objections on ‘Substantial Motion’, we conclude that the difference of these two well-known philosophers in the premise of ‘Substantial Motion’ originates from the most important philosophical position that is called ‘Principal of Existence’ or ‘Priority of quiddity. On this basis of these facts and despite of all denials and doubts of some other thinkers in Avicennas’s ‘Principle of priority of quiddity’ thought, based on this philosophical analysis , it can be explicitly seen the consideration of ‘priority of quiddity, which at least can end the doubts about ‘ Motion Premise’.
falsafe molasadra
Mohammad Salari; Jahangir Masoodi; Abbas Javareshkiyan
Abstract
The human soul interacts with and influences the outside world, and as much as it becomes stronger, its scope of influence extends to the outside world. This is the main hypothesis of our analysis in the discussion of the origin of Magic. Thus, the main question of the paper is what is the view of Ibn ...
Read More
The human soul interacts with and influences the outside world, and as much as it becomes stronger, its scope of influence extends to the outside world. This is the main hypothesis of our analysis in the discussion of the origin of Magic. Thus, the main question of the paper is what is the view of Ibn Sina and the Sadra School about the origin of Magic? In addition to the philosophical theories, we will get help from religious teachings to answer the question and prove that the nature and the origin of magic is the human soul. The research method in this paper is a descriptive-analytic one, which seeks to state that extraordinary actions such as magic stem from the faculty of the Will of Human soul, and that its influence is grounded in the laws of nature, e.g., the law of cause and effect. In other word, the spiritual power of some human beings is the origin of extraordinary actions like magic.
